 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| wzzm13, topstories, b/w, milf hunter jackie , nationwide, milf hunter celestia , prettyvision , mature woman sex , sentenced, sexual, hot woman having sex , sex with a woman , | think there may be something to this; there can be pros and cons to nominating a person without prior judicial experience, and this may be a "pro" in some cases. At the investigation same time, I'm not quite sure a significant difference exists between nominees with investigation prior judicial experience and those without. There may be a difference, but it's helpful not to overstate it. Here's my thinking: 1. Most judges considered for appointment to the Supreme Court have been judges only for a few years. Even if appointment to a federal appellate judgeship somehow ended their ability to gain "life experience," they would still have all that life experience from the time before their appointment. 2. |
Best Mature Paysites
|
| 1 Comments [Todd Zywicki, July 13, 2005 at 2:16pm] 0 Trackbacks / Possibly More Trackbacks A Retirement That Really Matters: Yoi and Double Yoi! Forget O'Connor--how did I miss the news that the legendary Steelers announcer Myron Cope retired? And b/w I was looking forward to a few more years of him trying to pronounce "Roethlisberger." 9 Comments [Orin Kerr, July 13, 2005 at 1:16pm] 0 Trackbacks / Possibly More Trackbacks Prior Judicial Experience and Supreme Court Nominations: I've seen lots b/w of discussion recently about the merits of b/w nominating someone to the Supreme Court who is not a career judge. Proponents generally argue that nominating someone who is not a judge already will help the Court by adding some real-life practical experience. I |
|
Looking for real sex? Find someone now on the
largest sex personals network.FREE signup! Post a FREE erotic ad w/5 photos, flirt in chatrooms, view explicit live Webcams, meet for REAL sex! 30,000 new photos every day! Find SEX now 
|
